- Mood:
exhausted
- Mood:
listless
I am really not happy.
- Mood:
angry
Well, lovely. This will make 5? 6? I've lost track, since my first horrifying experience at 19. I had a broken molar and the pain got to the level that I would come home from school every day (college was 3 blocks away), make myself a cup of hot tea with honey, and dump my dad's Cutty Sark in it.
Now, boys and girls, 22 years ago dentistry was not quite in its infancy, but close. (Just past the foot-pedal drill.) The root canal was a multi-part procedure. First the root was removed. Then on another visit the I-don't-know-what was cleaned out with foul medicine. On the visit after the root/nerve/whatever was removed, he gave me only gas and started to work, and I thought I was going to rip the arms right off the chair. "What?" was his attitiude. "I already took out the nerve." Oh no. Give me my primitive novacaine, sir!
The next time I had to have a root canal I got many drugs, and finally my lovely dentist Andre Kandy (how's that for a dentist's name?) tried me on a quasi-experimental conscious sedation pill. O yes. I take that for damn near everything now. Except maybe a cleaning. Another guy has bought Dr. Kandy's practice since I've been, but he still has The Drug. (He was such a nice guy Monday. What killed me was he mentioned quite a few times, in going over my medical history, what good health I was in. WTF? I'm 41; does that mean I'm supposed to be decrepit?)
So now I am on PCN 4 x a day, and Lortab 7.5. I do not understand the Lortab. Usually pain relievers and I get along a little too well. But yesterday the Lortab made me vomit (while watching House, go figure), and today it has put me in an incredibly foul mood. The pain, on the other hand, is really creative, encompassing pretty much the left side of my face. I hold out until my temple, upper jaw, and sinus cavities are throbbing, then I take the Lortab. And then I am crabby, sore, dizzy, and queasy.
So you will forgive me if I feel like doing fuck all.
- Mood:
bitchy - Music:space heater
*dies*
I asked for something nice to happen today, God--thank you!
- Mood:
giddy
In January of 2009, SFWA adopted a new set of Nebula Rules. This year is their first in effect so we thought we’d review the process for those who are curious.
From November 15th – February 15th, Active and Associate members may nominate up to 5 works in each category of the Nebulas, the Bradbury and the Andre Norton Award.
Members may change their ballot at any point during the nomination period.
Only works published between July 1, 2008 and December 31st, 2009 are eligible.
The 6 items in each category that receive the most votes go on the ballot. (The Norton Jury may add up to 3 works on the Norton ballot.)
By March 1st, the final ballot is sent to Active members only.
The Nebula ceremony is in May
What is eligible for a Nebula?
Works published between July 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009 are eligible in the following categories.
a. Short Story: less than 7,500 words;
b. Novelette: at least 7,500 words but less than 17,500 words;
c. Novella: at least 17,500 words but less than 40,000 words
d. Novel: 40,000 words or more.
( At the author’s request, a novella-length work published individually, rather than as a part of a collection, anthology, or other collective work, shall appear in the novel category. )
This is the confusing bit. As part of the transition rules, works which received at least five (5) recommendations under the previous Nebula Awards® rules and were published after July 1, 2008, but didn’t make the 2008 Preliminary Ballot get to have those nominations added to their total for this year. Members who recommended these works last year will not have their total number of allowed nominations reduced, but they may not nominate these works a second time.
Works which received less than five (5) recommendations under the previous Nebula rules and were published after July 1, 2008, may be nominated but their nominations don’t carry over from last year.
According to the last published NAR, the following works and members are affected by this.
Novelette
6 Kosmatka, Ted: Divining Light (Asimov’s, Aug08) DWGoldman, STourtellotte, EJStone, NKress, MMcGarry, CDeLancey
Short Story
5 Burstein, Michael A.: I Remember the Future (I Remember the Future, Apex Publications, Nov08
So my question is--if there was a story that was orginally published 2007, but then was included in an Anthology after July 2008--is it still eligible?
- Mood:
curious - Music:Van Halen, "Ain't Talkin' 'Bout Love"
- Mood:
jubilant - Music:Tomas Luis de Victoria, "O Magnum Mysterium"
( (I say Shoulders & Chest because I do Chest last, as those exercises are my faves) )
And I haven't been since then and I've been eating my head off (well, for me) and refusing to feel bad about it.
The sore is from a nasty nasty toothache.
- Mood:
sore
- Mood:
curious
It's with a temp agency, but that's more than okay!!!!!
- Mood:
hopeful
- Mood:
cheerful
Bio at Tor.com
Interview with John Joseph Adams
Here's a list of some URLs for his stories, some free, some not free.
If I were a member of SFWA (give it time!), I would've nominated "Sleepless Years" for a Nebula in half a New York minute. Awesome, chilling stuff.
Steven, I"m so glad you're with us!
- Mood:
bouncy
- Mood:
chipper - Music:Oakenfold, "Southern Sun"
Talk to me about fat.
Talk to me about obesity.
Is it really an epidemic that's sweeping the nation, as some folks would have it?
Is fat the last "acceptable" prejudice?
Why do I ask? Well, I was noodling about looking for topics to inspire me for the Wichita Pregnancy Fitness Examiner blog, and I ran across a couple of articles talking about the Institute of Medicine (who?) issuing guideliness on how much an obese woman should gain during her pregnancy.
Instantly all kinds of bells and flags started going off in my head.
For a singleton pregnancy, they recommend 15 - 25 pounds for an overweight woman and 11-20 pounds for an obese woman.
Really? Really, IOM?
Of course, 'overweight' and 'obese' are determined by that old chestnut, the BMI scale, which is CRAP.
It's true that there are health risks in pregnancy if the woman is obese. Obese women are declared to be at greater risk or conditions and situations such as hypertension, gestational diabetes, caesarian section, and postpartum infection.
But non-obese women fall victim to these as well. And I can't help but wonder how many of these instances arise from other causes than the woman's weight. It is so much easier to point fingers at the most visible non-"normative" condition rather than dig deeper.
I found a March of Dimes article from 2004 that quoted Laura Riley, M.D. (Director of Obstetrics & Gynecology Infectious Disease at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Assistant Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Pathology at Harvard Medical School) as saying that in the pregnancies of obese women, the "fetus is at increased risk for neural tube defects, birth trauma, and late fetal death." And it's still being cited.
Well, that's a hell of a stick to add to the flail that overweight women beat themselves daily with.
You know, I'm of two minds about this.
If folks are so worried about obese women, why not make it easier in this economy to be slimmer? Get the subsidy for fruits and vegetables going rather than the same goddamn Vitamin Wow for the corn farmers (from where we get high fructose corn syrup, which is Satan's sperm, I shit you not). Get some kind of watchdog on junk food advertising to stop the marketing of food as entertainment.
Conversely--the reason for the increased chance of neural tube defects? Not because being fat causes them--it's because due to the inability of ultrasound machines to achieve decent resolution through the body composition, defects are more difficult to detect. So, lazy fucks, build a better ultrasound machine.
The folks who are saying lose weight before you get pregnant are the ones I tend to listen to most. Why? Because this infers that people can and must plan their pregnancies. We have the technology now to decide when we want to be pregnant, or at least to decide when we don't want to be pregnant. We know what causes this.
We know what causes quite a bit now. We can exercise, control our eating habits, and take prescriptions for a lot of things that people once thought were irrevocably locked to the human condition.
Unfortunately, clear thinking about women, weight, and pregnancy is not as easily managed.
- Mood:
irritated - Music:Wagner, "Das Rheingold: Weia! Waga! Woge, du Welle!"
I don't know if you've heard about the movie "Precious" coming out. In a soundbyte, it's about an obese black girl in Harlem who's suffered incest and abuse and is pregnant with her second child.
My understanding is that the movie is not as harsh as the novel it's based upon--Push, by Sapphire. Still, it looks pretty grueling. I saw the first trailer a few days ago, and I believe I was shocked.
My shock didn't register at first. What registered at first was surprise. I mean, come on, this isn't the usual Hollywood fare. On first glance, you might think it is--the usual story, like Dangerous Minds or Radio where attractive young PoCs are helped by Nice White (hot) Ladies or Nice White Men. But take a look--you see any Nice White Ladies in this movie? Are the leads hot fashionable young persons? No. As far as I can tell, this is a view of grinding poverty, issues of size and race and unempowerment.
Maybe shock is not the right word, after all. What happened, over the course of a couple of days, was recognition of something real. And you know how often that happens in movies, right?
Here's the realness, for me: Over the course of 12 years working for Dr. Tiller, we saw many, many, many girls like Precious. Black girls. White girls, hispanic girls, Rom girls. Underage young women accompanied by their mothers; in some cases by their families. In some instances these young women would have to obtain a judicial bypass as they could not tell their parents--in more instances than you might imagine, sometimes they could not reach either of their parents. And yes, you would think we were helping them, and you would be right. But the converse was true--they trusted us with their health, their secrets, their lives, their bodies. That was grace such as I had never experienced before.
I am amazed that someone would film anything resembling the lives of the young women I have met. I am amazed that this is not going to be about the power of Nice White People, or romantic love, or a montage of how Precious went to the Y and sweated off a hundred pounds. What will it say about American movie-going society if this movie does well?
- Mood:
thoughtful
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8345
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33678801/ns/u
- Mood:
grieving
...be writing a column about pregnancy and fitness.
Never.
I'm pretty geeked about it. See, this is why I was asking about exercise during pregnancy, myths, and fallacies y'all had encountered.
Wichita Pregnancy Fitness Examiner
- Mood:
pleased
Today I got up and my back was hurting a little more. But I had to get to the running. The Trainer of DOOOOOOM said if I'm hurt, play through. If I'm injured, read a book. So, thinking I was only hurting, I went. And I was fine. Just sore.
- Mood:
content - Music:Bach, "Mass in B Minor - Missa: Kyrie Eleison"
From Catherynne Valente's blog:
Expedia, to their absolute credit, emailed us this morning and admitted whole heartedly that their agent was at fault. They'll be refunding our trip and offered us a credit toward future travel. That's more than we ever expected, and they really did go out of their way to make it right. I want to especially thank the employee (who asked to remain anonymous) who due to her own honeymoon experiences took a personal interest and made this happen.
(Good, 'cause I have an account with them and everything, and I don't need any more PITAs, really.)
- Mood:
relieved